Blog
Sheep v. Tractor
22 May 2011
Two Paddocks
The debate rages on
About this time of year, you are probably considering capital purchases, and the issue often arises – should we go the tractor option, or fall back on the sheep? A tough one, we agree, but grass must be cut.
So here’s a simple guide to the pros and cons.


The Sheep ...for
- Self propelled, no operator required
- Quiet, except when upset
- Wool fibre by-product, itchy but warm
- No garaging required, or road permit
- Makes good pet, outside only
- Cheap to run, powered by grass
- Responsive to barking (runs away)
- Useful for Nativity plays
The Tractor...for
- Available in many colours. Red and green popular
- Fast
- No dog required
- Multi-tasks: e.g. could drain a swamp, flatten a car, etc.
The Sheep ...against
- Only available in 2 colours, black or white
- No dealership support
- Some methane emission (do not smoke near sheep)
- Needs annual shearing, prone to foot rot
- May panic en masse
- Spare parts unavailable
The Tractor...against
- No by-products
- Expensive to run, powered by fossil fuels
- Loud, even at sheep speed
- Dangerous on hills
- Highly paid operator required
- Makes a lousy pet
- Inedible (but then so are our sheep)
Finally, Sir Edmond Hillary chose a tractor, not a sheep, to take to the South Pole. On the other hand, Ermengildo Zegna never made a suit from old John Deere parts; he prefers good merino wool.
You decide...